Совершенно точно! Я бы только по письменам Ликийским на монете предположил:
вот описание:
Dynasts of Lycia. Teththiveibi AR Stater. Circa 440-430 BC. Head of a goddess, perhaps Aphrodite, ** to left, wearing pearl necklace and spiral earring, her hair tied with bands and bound up at the back / Owl standing to left, head facing , TETHTHIVEIBI around. SNG von Aulock -; BMC -; Traité -; SNG Copenhagen -; Kraay, ACGC 208 = Mørkolm-Zahle, Acta Archeologica 47, 1976, p. 54, 8, pl. 1, C = Robinson NC 1936, p. 194, no. 43 (correction: 9.65g not 11.59g). 9.58g, 20mm, 11h. Slight mark on obv., otherwise Good Very Fine. Of the highest rarity – one of only two known specimens, and the only one in private hands. From the James Howard Collection. This remarkable coin is obverse die linked to the regular tetraskeles staters of Teththiveibi, though was clearly struck in far reduced numbers than that type. Its production coincided with an issue of coinage at Teos which also accurately reproduced the Athenian owl as an adjunct symbol on its obverse; these issues flooded the eastern markets and have been found as far afield as Rhegion and Messana, where they were overstruck with local types. ** H. Mattingly (A New Light on the Early Silver Coinage of Teos) convincingly argued that 'standardised' owls became known in the east only after 449 BC, and given that it would have taken some considerable time for them to become familiar enough to invite imitation, the copying at Teos and in Lycia should be dated to after 440 BC. ** The type was continued and strongly favoured by Kheriga in his 'Aphrodite' series, circa 440-410 BC.